|
Title: Miss some of the old rules? Post by: scwoman70 on July 02, 2007, 10:26:36 AM I don't know about the rest of you, but there is one old rule that I wish they would go back to. I preferred it when everyone who had been in the house got to vote for the winner at the end. Also, that they got to see all of what happened in the house. I think it was better that way so that they had to answer for everything they had done. The way it has been more recenlty with the sequester house and them only getting to see part of what went on isn't as suspenseful. You never knew how some of the people would vote after they saw all the footage.
What do you all think? Are there other things you preferred from prior seasons? Krissy Title: Re: Miss some of the old rules? Post by: Dan on July 07, 2007, 01:27:12 PM Krissy,
I'm kind of in the middle on this. I can see why they don't let them see everything that happens in the house after their eviction. I believe this stemmed from the way it is done on Survivor where the jury is only allowed to see tribal councils after they have been voted off. They are not privy to everything else that happens in the game in their absence. I think it was just a way for BB to keep the sactity of the game intact. But I see your point also :) |